Daytona Beach, FL — A self-proclaimed socialist and gig economy worker has ignited a firestorm of controversy after posting a video online in which he boasts about refusing to deliver food to a local Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility — instead canceling the orders and keeping the meals for himself.
The man, who claims to work for either DoorDash or Uber Eats, appears in the video saying, “When the local ICE facility orders food, like for delivery, and I'm bringing them their food, I don't bring them their food. I get it canceled. I just take it.” His remarks, delivered with apparent pride, have triggered intense debate across social media platforms, with reactions ranging from praise to condemnation.
In the same video, the driver promotes his personal page, aligning his actions with his political beliefs: “If you're a socialist like me and you believe in a future like Star Trek, then come join my page.” He adds, “I know we're all cautious about who to follow nowadays, but just so you know, I hate Charlie Kirk, I love Star Trek,” referencing the conservative commentator and invoking a utopian sci-fi vision as part of his ideological stance.
The video, which has since been shared widely, has drawn sharp criticism from legal experts and delivery service users alike. Many argue that the driver’s actions amount to theft, regardless of political motivation. “This isn’t civil disobedience — it’s stealing,” one commenter wrote. Others, however, view the act as a symbolic protest against ICE, an agency that has long been the subject of heated political debate over immigration enforcement.
Legal analysts caution that if the claims are true, the driver could face serious consequences. “Tampering with or misappropriating customer orders violates the terms of service for virtually every major delivery platform,” said attorney Rachel Kim, a specialist in labor and consumer law. “If the company verifies this behavior, it could result in termination, and potentially criminal charges depending on local statutes.”
Both DoorDash and Uber Eats have yet to issue public statements regarding the incident. However, both companies maintain strict policies against order interference and have systems in place to track and investigate delivery anomalies. It remains unclear whether the driver’s identity has been confirmed or whether any disciplinary action has been taken.
The incident has reignited broader conversations about the intersection of gig work and political activism. As more workers use social media to express dissent or challenge institutions, questions arise about the ethical boundaries of protest — especially when it involves private transactions and customer expectations.
“This is a new frontier,” said sociologist Dr. Lena Morales. “Gig workers occupy a unique space — they’re not traditional employees, yet they interact directly with the public. When political beliefs influence service delivery, it forces us to reconsider the responsibilities and limits of these roles.”
As the video continues to circulate, it remains a flashpoint in the ongoing debate over immigration, labor rights, and the politicization of everyday services. Whether viewed as protest or misconduct, the driver’s actions have sparked a conversation that shows no signs of slowing down.
Add comment
Comments